The power of law and the power of people in defense of human rights and the environment
corner corner

You are not authorised to view this resource.
You need to login.
Features

ERI Releases Most Comprehensive Survey on Chinese Multinational Corporate Investment in Burma

September 29, 2008, Chiang Mai, Thailand and Washington, D.C. – A survey released by EarthRights International reveals an increase in the number of Chinese multinational corporations (MNCs) involved in hydropower, oil and natural gas, and mining projects in Burma (Myanmar). The report, China in Burma (Myanmar): The Increasing Involvement of Chinese Multinational Corporations in Burma’s Hydropower, Oil and Natural Gas, and Mining Sectors, is the most comprehensive survey on Chinese investment in Burma to date and identifies 69 Chinese MNC’S involved in 90 completed, current and planned projects in the hydropower and extractive sectors in Burma. Previous ERI research collected between May and August 2007 identified only 26 Chinese MNCs involved in 62 projects. This research, conducted over the last year, draws upon government statements, English and Chinese language news reports, and company press releases.

Click here to read the full press release.


On July 28, 2003, President Bush signed the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. That law states that "no article may be imported into the United States that is produced, mined, manufactured, grown, or assembled in Burma." This means that no teak may be legally imported into the United States directly from Burma, and that the companies listed on these webpages, including Kingsley-Bate, East Teak Trading Company, and Country Casual will have stopped importing teak from Burma, in order to comply with the law.

With human rights scandals tainting the operations of extractive resource operations around the world, seven major oil and mining companies recently signed a code of conduct pledging that their security operations will meet minimal human rights standards. A number of governments, human rights and media organizations were quick to praise the initiative as an "important step." But before we applaud too vigorously, we should evaluate whether voluntary codes such as this one are truly a step in the right direction.