| Alliance for a Corporate-Free UN |
|
|
|
| Monday, 20 February 2006 | |
|
The Alliance for a Corporate-Free UN is a global network of human rights, environmental and development groups working to address undue corporate influence in the United Nations, and to support UN initiatives to hold corporations accountable on issues of human rights, labor rights and the environment. EarthRights International serves as the Alliance Secretariat. PlatformThe members of the Alliance believe in a United Nations which:
ActivitiesThe Alliance has three main activities:
Steering CommitteeBrazilian Institute for Social and Economic Analysis (Brazil) RationaleDo the Nike swoosh and the UN olive branch emblem belong together? Are McDonald's and Disney companies that represent universal educational and cultural values? Do giant oil companies like Shell, BP and Chevron hold the keys to sustainable development? UN Secretary General Kofi Annan thinks the answers might be yes, and he is leading a major effort to form partnerships between the United Nations and the business community. The "business community," in this case is made up of the giant transnational corporations--companies that have increased their power through the process of economic globalization and come under fire for their unjust labor and environmental records. Annan has encouraged all UN agencies to form these business partnerships, including some of those most respected for their dedication to UN values, like Unicef, the International Labor Organization and the United Nations Development Programme. The Secretary General has personally spearheaded the highest profile corporate collaboration, the Global Compact. At the launch of the Global Compact in July 2000, Annan shared the podium with CEOs of companies like Nike, Shell and Rio Tinto. What Is Wrong With The Partnerships?A partnership should be entered between parties that share the same goals. Global corporations do not share the same goals as the United Nations. Therefore, we believe that "partnership" is the wrong relationship between the UN and business. In some cases, the UN is forming partnerships known human rights violators, or despoilers of the environment. It is not appropriate for the UN to form partnerships with companies like Nike and Shell, companies that violate human rights norms and exploit the worst dynamics of corporate globalization. In the case of the Global Compact, dozens of corporations, many known for their poor social and environmental records, have agreed to follow nine human rights, labor rights and environmental principles. But there is no monitoring of corporate adherence to these principles and no enforcement. The UN should not be picking sides in the active debate over corporate globalization. Allowing the International Chamber of Commerce and its large members to dominate the UN's approach to business means that the UN has effectively endorsed the current dominant version of globalization. The UN should not endorse the WTO vision of corporate globalization, but rather be a counterbalance to it. As supporters of the United Nations, we are concerned that corporate partnership programs at the UN will compromise the UN's image, values and integrity. |




