Doe v. Unocal

Unocal has agreed to settle the claims in Doe v. Unocal and compensate the villagers who sued the firm for complicity in forced labor, rape, and murder.

Plaintiffs in this case sought redress for the human rights abuses associated with the Unocal pipeline project in Burma. The plaintiffs were Burmese peasants who suffered a variety of egregious violations at the hands of Burmese army units that were securing the pipeline route. These abuses included forced relocation, forced labor, rape, torture, and murder. In addition to EarthRights International (ERI), counsel for the plaintiffs included Paul Hoffman, the Center for Constitutional Rights, Hadsell & Stormer, and Judith Brown Chomsky.

Documents:

doe-v-unocal-09-14-2004.pdf [1]

Unocal-response-to-doj-9th-circuit-brief-2.pdf [2]

Unocal-doj-unocal-brief.pdf [3]

Unocal-enbanc-transcript.pdf [4]

Unocal-9th-circuit-sosa-brief-2.pdf [5]

Unocal-state-complaint-2003.pdf [6]

Unocal-opposition-brief-to-doj.pdf [7]

Unocal-doj-brief.pdf [8]

Unocal-Decision-0056603.pdf [9]

Unocal-Plaintiff-MSA-Ruling.pdf [10]

Unocal-Vicarious-Liability-MSA-Ruling.pdf [11]

Unocal-Tort-Liability-MSA-Ruling.pdf [12]

Unocal-paez-1997-Jurisdiction-Decision.pdf [13]

Unocal-response-to-doj-9th-circui-brief1.pdf [14]

Unocal-9th-circuit-sosa-brief-1.pdf [15]